Sunday, November 11, 2007
Did I taint it up?
I checked my summarizing work and believe I kept a tone similar to the original author's. I don't really have my own opinion on this subject because I really never thought about it. It would be hard for me to let an opinion that doesn't exist seep through my writing.
Britney Spears: The New Evil of the World
Nisey Williams addresses her concerns with pop culture fashion and its effects in her paper “Why I Hate Britney.” In her paper she explains her feelings about raising a daughter in the face of a sex-pumped society. Her main focus is not just the pop culture, the influential pop stars, and the concern other parents hold; but she also addresses the issue of clothing designs and its connection with the pop culture.
Williams begins with a simple statement:
I am afraid of having children.
One must wonder why. The main reason for her fear, as she states, is that she may have a daughter. With the threat of having her daughter exposed to a society that focuses on sexual appeal due to pop culture, Williams can’t help but have that fear.
Williams’ main focus in this ad homonem approach is Britney Spears. Britney Spears, being one of pop culture’s main figures, plays a great role in the lives of spectators of all ages. It’s not just Britney any parent needs to worry about. Williams continues to explain that there are others to blame as well. Williams addresses them as the “Britney et al.” Williams continues saying “these destructive divas serve young girls with an earful and an eyeful of sex, tempting children to mimic there musical heroes.”
It is explained that Britney Spears claims to have good intentions, but her actions are conflicting with those claims. Williams addresses one pop star, Avril Lavigne, with a bit of reverence. The reason is simple. Avril doesn’t dress scantily to gain fame. Britney doesn’t even realize her influence on her young listeners. Williams quotes Britney’s response to criticism judging her clothing style:
I mean, I’m a girl! Why not?
Williams explains this message is a horrible one for a young girl to learn. Such problems as eating disorders and low self-esteem can occur because of the high pressure for this superficial perfection.
Other problems occur also. Parents are faced with the responsibility of keeping their young ones from falling victim to this pressure. It is becoming harder and harder to keep their daughters from the influence of pop culture. Unfortunately, because of the increased influence, many young girls are becoming sexually active earlier and earlier.
Williams then turns to address the issue of clothing companies. Because of the styles seen on pop culture music videos, teens crave to have the same styles. Clothing companies, working closely with pop culture artists and companies, gladly comply with these ever increasing fads. Williams states that one of her co-workers “had such a difficult time school shopping for her thirteen-year-old daughter that she ended up taking her to Academy.” Academy is a sports store which also features school uniform clothing.
Although Williams does attack the clothing companies as aiding in this sex-crazed clothing fad, she digresses to say it is not her main concern. Her main focus is still on the celebrities responsible for the sexual images being sent out to teens. Williams statement “pop culture seems to be in downward spiral, continually going from bad to worse” clearly states her concern not just for today’s society but for the future society in which she may have to raise her daughter.
Williams begins with a simple statement:
I am afraid of having children.
One must wonder why. The main reason for her fear, as she states, is that she may have a daughter. With the threat of having her daughter exposed to a society that focuses on sexual appeal due to pop culture, Williams can’t help but have that fear.
Williams’ main focus in this ad homonem approach is Britney Spears. Britney Spears, being one of pop culture’s main figures, plays a great role in the lives of spectators of all ages. It’s not just Britney any parent needs to worry about. Williams continues to explain that there are others to blame as well. Williams addresses them as the “Britney et al.” Williams continues saying “these destructive divas serve young girls with an earful and an eyeful of sex, tempting children to mimic there musical heroes.”
It is explained that Britney Spears claims to have good intentions, but her actions are conflicting with those claims. Williams addresses one pop star, Avril Lavigne, with a bit of reverence. The reason is simple. Avril doesn’t dress scantily to gain fame. Britney doesn’t even realize her influence on her young listeners. Williams quotes Britney’s response to criticism judging her clothing style:
I mean, I’m a girl! Why not?
Williams explains this message is a horrible one for a young girl to learn. Such problems as eating disorders and low self-esteem can occur because of the high pressure for this superficial perfection.
Other problems occur also. Parents are faced with the responsibility of keeping their young ones from falling victim to this pressure. It is becoming harder and harder to keep their daughters from the influence of pop culture. Unfortunately, because of the increased influence, many young girls are becoming sexually active earlier and earlier.
Williams then turns to address the issue of clothing companies. Because of the styles seen on pop culture music videos, teens crave to have the same styles. Clothing companies, working closely with pop culture artists and companies, gladly comply with these ever increasing fads. Williams states that one of her co-workers “had such a difficult time school shopping for her thirteen-year-old daughter that she ended up taking her to Academy.” Academy is a sports store which also features school uniform clothing.
Although Williams does attack the clothing companies as aiding in this sex-crazed clothing fad, she digresses to say it is not her main concern. Her main focus is still on the celebrities responsible for the sexual images being sent out to teens. Williams statement “pop culture seems to be in downward spiral, continually going from bad to worse” clearly states her concern not just for today’s society but for the future society in which she may have to raise her daughter.
Monday, November 5, 2007
Articles
Hoff, David J., and Alyson Klein. "Bush, Others Want Law to Go Beyond the Basics." Education Week 27 (2007): 18-21. Acadamic Search Premier. EBSCOhost. Helmke Library, Fort Wayne. 5 Nov. 2007.
The article focuses on the reauthorization of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and the effort that President George W. Bush is making to get the bill passed. In October 2007 Bush spoke about NCLB that has lead some to believe that he and other legislators are planning changes to the bill. These changes are believed to be related to improving math and reading skills to above grade level ability.
Jacobson, Linda. "Congress Weighs Bills on Early Childhood Education." Education Week 27 (2007): 23-25. Academic Search Premier. EBSCOhost. Helmke Library, Fort Wayne. 5 Nov. 2007.
The article focuses on the reauthorization of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and legislation effecting early childhood education that would officially place the later under the law. U.S. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton has written a proposed Ready to Learn Act that would give funding for states to pay for pre-Kindergarten programs. Senator Bob Casey has also written a proposal for the Prepare All Kids Act and Representative Mazie K. Hirono also has proposed legislation.
Hoff, David J. "Spelling Takes Issue with NCLB Draft Bill." Education Week 27 (2007): 21-22. Academic Search Premier. EBSCOhost. Helmke Library, Fort Wayne. 5 Nov. 2007.
The article discusses the reauthorization of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) with which Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings and Representative George Miller have a disagreement. Spellings is concerned that there are too many loopholes in the proposed bills' educational accountability proposals. Miller's proposal is that other indicators besides standardized test scores would be used to measure adequate yearly progress (AYP).
The article focuses on the reauthorization of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and the effort that President George W. Bush is making to get the bill passed. In October 2007 Bush spoke about NCLB that has lead some to believe that he and other legislators are planning changes to the bill. These changes are believed to be related to improving math and reading skills to above grade level ability.
Jacobson, Linda. "Congress Weighs Bills on Early Childhood Education." Education Week 27 (2007): 23-25. Academic Search Premier. EBSCOhost. Helmke Library, Fort Wayne. 5 Nov. 2007.
The article focuses on the reauthorization of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and legislation effecting early childhood education that would officially place the later under the law. U.S. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton has written a proposed Ready to Learn Act that would give funding for states to pay for pre-Kindergarten programs. Senator Bob Casey has also written a proposal for the Prepare All Kids Act and Representative Mazie K. Hirono also has proposed legislation.
Hoff, David J. "Spelling Takes Issue with NCLB Draft Bill." Education Week 27 (2007): 21-22. Academic Search Premier. EBSCOhost. Helmke Library, Fort Wayne. 5 Nov. 2007.
The article discusses the reauthorization of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) with which Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings and Representative George Miller have a disagreement. Spellings is concerned that there are too many loopholes in the proposed bills' educational accountability proposals. Miller's proposal is that other indicators besides standardized test scores would be used to measure adequate yearly progress (AYP).
Pictures and Graphs: NCLB
http://www.hispanicmpr.com/images/hmprphotos2007/hmprellgraph.jpg
http://aftmichigan.org/images/ayp3.jpghttp://images-cdn01.associatedcontent.com/150_0000003734_0000021498.jpg
http://aftmichigan.org/images/ayp3.jpghttp://images-cdn01.associatedcontent.com/150_0000003734_0000021498.jpg
The graph will help add hard evidence of the differences in education among the races. The requirements of the states shows an example of the NCLB requirements. The NCLB Logo is the nationally accepted logo for the NCLB program.
No Ark Noah
Unfortunately the link to the slate site was down but I will answer the related questions as best to my ability.
1. I believe the links Noah had provided are used to further support his argument and provide evidence. They add more information and therefore increases understanding. I might consider using links in an argument on the web mostly because it would give the reader the chance to do their own research on the subject.
2. I believe Noah’s use of quoting from the original works help him argue his case persuasively. It reveals to the reader that he understands what his subject is and he knows what it is he’s arguing.
1. I believe the links Noah had provided are used to further support his argument and provide evidence. They add more information and therefore increases understanding. I might consider using links in an argument on the web mostly because it would give the reader the chance to do their own research on the subject.
2. I believe Noah’s use of quoting from the original works help him argue his case persuasively. It reveals to the reader that he understands what his subject is and he knows what it is he’s arguing.
Consider, not Censor
I agree with Dershowitz. Although a “hate speech” is a considerably bad thing, it should not be censored. Dershowitz’s solution is that the speeches of that nature should be criticized and answered. My views actually have stayed the same on this subject. I believe this is the right and just way to handle such speeches.
Saturday, October 27, 2007
Freedom of Speech
I agree with Milena Ateya’s point of view that freedom of speech is a blessing and should not be hindered regardless of any offense one might take. I believe a “hate speech,” although nasty, is allowed. It merely is displaying one person’s opinion of something (or someone). Not all who listen to the speech will agree with it. If such a speech were given on a college campus, then those who hear it will react either negatively or will agree with it (either wholly or in part). It is right that other students react in a way that is legal such as counter arguments, peaceful protesting, and other such show of opinion and stance. I believe it is possible to say whatever is on our mind provided it is protected by our rights. Things such as profanity are not protected and therefore should not be used. I have run into this issue before, but only in other classes.
No Child Left Behind: Statistics
This will help with my argument by showing what was promised in the NCLB Act and what actually was acheived.
The final graph will help in showing the overall progress shown over the years in a state's school assessment.
http://www.weac.org/Graphics/2005-06/june06/edfunding.jpg
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Education/upload/b1987chart_2_lrg.jpg
This graph will help me in that it shows the federal spending towards education and exactly the results of reading scores over the years for different age groups in comparison to the amount being spent.
http://www.mcps.k12.md.us/about/strategicplan/annualreport/goal1/images/g1m1dp1.gif
Dumbledore is GAY! So, is this bad?
This image indicates an argument dealing with the sexual orientation of Dumbledore. It looks down on the fact that he's gay and even makes fun of the fact. This negative outlook is being taken in a rather comical way.
Yes, it's nice that gays finally got a major character in the sci-fi/fantasy universe. Until now, we had been shut out of the major franchises. J.R.R. Tolkien wrote a rich supply of homoeroticism into The Lord of the Rings--all those men and hobbits and elves singing to one another during long, womanless quests. The books and their film versions feature tender scenes between Frodo and Samwise. But in the end, Sam marries Rosie and fathers 13 children. Thirteen! Got something to prove, hobbit?
So along comes Rowling with Dumbledore--a human being, a wizard even, an indisputable hero and one of the most beloved figures in children's literature. You’d think his being gay would be met with great cheer. However, this picture shows how some have taken it in a negative way.
The main reason for all this negativity, other than anti-gay feelings, is the fact that it was not brought out by Dumbledore himself. Never in the books did it mention his sexual preferences nor was his orientation ever even questioned. His being gay is taken as random and almost without serious consideration what so ever. Rowling’s “coming out” for Dumbledore was, without question, unforeseen and not expected.
As far as we know, Dumbledore had not fully realized romance in all his 115 years--just a lifetime spent around children and, for the seven years we know him, a fascination with the boy Potter. The photo indicates how pathetic and frustratingly stereotypical this is. It's difficult to believe someone as wise and sane as Dumbledore couldn't find at least one wizard his age to take to the Three Broomsticks.
So along comes Rowling with Dumbledore--a human being, a wizard even, an indisputable hero and one of the most beloved figures in children's literature. You’d think his being gay would be met with great cheer. However, this picture shows how some have taken it in a negative way.
The main reason for all this negativity, other than anti-gay feelings, is the fact that it was not brought out by Dumbledore himself. Never in the books did it mention his sexual preferences nor was his orientation ever even questioned. His being gay is taken as random and almost without serious consideration what so ever. Rowling’s “coming out” for Dumbledore was, without question, unforeseen and not expected.
As far as we know, Dumbledore had not fully realized romance in all his 115 years--just a lifetime spent around children and, for the seven years we know him, a fascination with the boy Potter. The photo indicates how pathetic and frustratingly stereotypical this is. It's difficult to believe someone as wise and sane as Dumbledore couldn't find at least one wizard his age to take to the Three Broomsticks.
This argument focuses on an pathos appeal. It draws on your emotions to feel for the woman who is suffering to agree with the message of ending domestic violence. The claim of the argument is mainly that abuse is wrong and that it should be stopped. This argument creates a pity for the suffering shown in the picture. It captures the audience's human nature of caring to persuade the audience to agree that ending domestic abuse is important.
Articles: NCLB
Carnevale, Anthony P. “No Child Gets Ahead.” Education Week: 9/26/2007, Vol. 27 Issue 5, p40-40, 1p, 1c
The author reflects on statistics that show a decline in academic achievement of children in working class families while in high school. The Early Childhood Longitudinal Study found that more than one million students from families making less than $85,000 annually who are in the top of their class in grade school, fall off the college track in high school. The way in which the author feels the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act hinders school standards is discussed.
Klein, Alyson and David Hoff. “Union Assail Teacher Ideas in NCLB Draft.” Education Week: 9/19/2007, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p19-20, 2p
The author reports on a lobbying campaign by national teachers' unions to not have teacher bonuses tied in with student test scores. The article discusses the National Education Association being in Washington, D.C. while the U.S. House Education and Labor Committee discussed the No Child Left Behind Act, in which the teacher bonus system is part of.
Hoff, David J. “Provision on Tutoring Raises Renewal Issues.” Education Week: 10/10/2007, Vol. 27 Issue 7, p18-19, 2p
The article presents information on the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), which is being reviewed for reauthorization in 2007. Among main points of discussion related to federal financed tutoring are eligibility for free tutoring services, evaluation of private and nonprofit providers of tutoring, and compensatory education fund expenditure requirements. Viewpoints of supports and opponents of the tutoring issues is included, as is information on other aspects of NCLB under discussion.
The author reflects on statistics that show a decline in academic achievement of children in working class families while in high school. The Early Childhood Longitudinal Study found that more than one million students from families making less than $85,000 annually who are in the top of their class in grade school, fall off the college track in high school. The way in which the author feels the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act hinders school standards is discussed.
Klein, Alyson and David Hoff. “Union Assail Teacher Ideas in NCLB Draft.” Education Week: 9/19/2007, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p19-20, 2p
The author reports on a lobbying campaign by national teachers' unions to not have teacher bonuses tied in with student test scores. The article discusses the National Education Association being in Washington, D.C. while the U.S. House Education and Labor Committee discussed the No Child Left Behind Act, in which the teacher bonus system is part of.
Hoff, David J. “Provision on Tutoring Raises Renewal Issues.” Education Week: 10/10/2007, Vol. 27 Issue 7, p18-19, 2p
The article presents information on the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), which is being reviewed for reauthorization in 2007. Among main points of discussion related to federal financed tutoring are eligibility for free tutoring services, evaluation of private and nonprofit providers of tutoring, and compensatory education fund expenditure requirements. Viewpoints of supports and opponents of the tutoring issues is included, as is information on other aspects of NCLB under discussion.
No Child Left Behind: Articles 'n Such
Lister, Gary. "Education is Not Like Fast Food." Editorial. American School Board Journal Nov. 2007: 54.
The author argues that there is no such end-all, do-all and be-all solution for educational problems, contrary to what the promoters of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act or other standards claim. He says that despite an unspoken corporate vision of universal sameness, and despite considerable investment in professional development, education, and training, differences exist.
Moscinski, Dave. “Proficiency for All?” Editorial. American School Board Journal Nov2007, Vol. 194 Issue 11: p28-29, 2p
The author reflects on how he learned to stop complaining and learned to appreciate the U.S. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. Initially, he did not like the NCLB policy, calling it a federal attempt to privatize public education with subgroup goals that were statistically impossible to attain. After carefully examining the Act's basic tenet of proficiency for all, however, he realized that it is not that bad after all. He shares his top 10 lessons for helping schools reach the goal of proficiency for all.
Bush, George W. "Remarks on the No Child Left Behind Act in New York City." New York. 26 Sept. 2007.
This article presents the text of a speech by U.S. President George W. Bush, delivered on September 26, 2007 in New York City, in which he discussed about the No Child Left Behind Act.
The author argues that there is no such end-all, do-all and be-all solution for educational problems, contrary to what the promoters of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act or other standards claim. He says that despite an unspoken corporate vision of universal sameness, and despite considerable investment in professional development, education, and training, differences exist.
Moscinski, Dave. “Proficiency for All?” Editorial. American School Board Journal Nov2007, Vol. 194 Issue 11: p28-29, 2p
The author reflects on how he learned to stop complaining and learned to appreciate the U.S. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. Initially, he did not like the NCLB policy, calling it a federal attempt to privatize public education with subgroup goals that were statistically impossible to attain. After carefully examining the Act's basic tenet of proficiency for all, however, he realized that it is not that bad after all. He shares his top 10 lessons for helping schools reach the goal of proficiency for all.
Bush, George W. "Remarks on the No Child Left Behind Act in New York City." New York. 26 Sept. 2007.
This article presents the text of a speech by U.S. President George W. Bush, delivered on September 26, 2007 in New York City, in which he discussed about the No Child Left Behind Act.
Education Progression Management: Take It to the Polls
Do you believe all students should have excellent schooling available to them?
Do you believe all schools should be subject to state control should their students fail to meet state academic goals?
Should tutoring be available to students unable to meet academic goals?
Should entire teaching staffs be replaced at the failure of meeting academic goals?
Do you believe standardized testing adequately measures the progress of academic skills?
Do you believe all schools should be subject to state control should their students fail to meet state academic goals?
Should tutoring be available to students unable to meet academic goals?
Should entire teaching staffs be replaced at the failure of meeting academic goals?
Do you believe standardized testing adequately measures the progress of academic skills?
Tattoos for Everyone!
http://usatoday.com/news/snapshot.htm?section=M&label=2007-10-26-merger
(I was unable to copy/paste or upload the actual graph so this link will take you to it. Go to “Life” and click the arrows until you’re on 7/20.)
Who’s Tattooed by Age:
18 – 29: 36%
30 – 39: 24%
40 – 50: 15%
- Almost 1 in 4 adults ages 18 to 50 has at least one tattoo.
By Anne R. Carey and Keith Carter, USA TODAY
Source: northwestern.edu
Claim 1: A greater amount of younger adults get tattoos than older people.
Support for Claim 1: The statistical graph shows the greater percentage of those with at least one tattoo lie in the age group of 18 to 29 year old adults. This age group is the younger ages compared to the other age blocks; that is 30 to 39 and 40 to 50.
Claim 2: Older adults don’t like tattoos.
Support for Claim 2: The lower amount of older people (ages 40 to 50) with tattoos is lowest in comparison to the younger and middle age groups. This can be interpreted as an effect of the dislike of tattoos in the age group.
Claim 3: Most adults do not have a tattoo.
Support for Claim 3: As stated in the overall statistic the graph reveals: Almost 1 in 4 adults ages 18 to 50 has at least one tattoo. This means that out of four adults from ages 18 to 50, three do not have a tattoo. From this, one may say the majority of adults do not have a tattoo.
(I was unable to copy/paste or upload the actual graph so this link will take you to it. Go to “Life” and click the arrows until you’re on 7/20.)
Who’s Tattooed by Age:
18 – 29: 36%
30 – 39: 24%
40 – 50: 15%
- Almost 1 in 4 adults ages 18 to 50 has at least one tattoo.
By Anne R. Carey and Keith Carter, USA TODAY
Source: northwestern.edu
Claim 1: A greater amount of younger adults get tattoos than older people.
Support for Claim 1: The statistical graph shows the greater percentage of those with at least one tattoo lie in the age group of 18 to 29 year old adults. This age group is the younger ages compared to the other age blocks; that is 30 to 39 and 40 to 50.
Claim 2: Older adults don’t like tattoos.
Support for Claim 2: The lower amount of older people (ages 40 to 50) with tattoos is lowest in comparison to the younger and middle age groups. This can be interpreted as an effect of the dislike of tattoos in the age group.
Claim 3: Most adults do not have a tattoo.
Support for Claim 3: As stated in the overall statistic the graph reveals: Almost 1 in 4 adults ages 18 to 50 has at least one tattoo. This means that out of four adults from ages 18 to 50, three do not have a tattoo. From this, one may say the majority of adults do not have a tattoo.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Agreements and Disagreements
In researching the No Child Left Behind Act on Opposing Viewpoints I found much on the topic both for and against the subject. This will help me greatly as I will need both sides to make a factual argument. Already I have learned that, althought they disagree on how, both democrats and republicans agree excellent schooling should be available to students. They agree! It amazes me. My mind, at this point, is not made up.
No Child Left Behind: What is it doing?
The article I have chosen to discuss is titled “Get Congress Out of the Classroom” by Diane Ravitch. This article caught my interest, not because of its anti-political sound, but because it presents an excellent argument concerning the No Child Left Behind Act. We all, as students, have dealt with the effects of this Act as it deals with our educational system. So many times my teachers told me that our school system couldn’t partake in a certain action because of the Act. I believe this to be a researchable topic as the No Child Left Behind Act and its effect on school systems are measurable and can be supported with hard evidence. I find it to be an important topic as it is affecting the way things are being taught in schools because of the standards set in the Act. It is important to be interested in this topic as it may affect the future intelligence of generations to come
Surveillance Saves the Day
In the YouTube video “Police Stupidity/Brutality caught on tape!” the use of surveillance is used to the advantage of society. The video plays through for the viewer to watch all that occurs. It then replays certain parts making sure to point out crucial evidence.
The video begins by showing the girl working. The officer then pulls up and pays for his order. She then gives him his change. After a time, the officer comes inside demanding he was short changed. His argument was that he had paid twenty dollars and had only received change for a ten. The girl explains she was only handed a ten and says exactly what the change was. The manager, determined to end the argument, double checks the register. There are no twenties inside. The officer, enraged, comes to the girl and threatens her with the mace spray and with arrest. She refuses saying she does not have the money, so the officer maces her and drags her out to his car. Unfortunately, she had to be taken to the hospital because of the effects of the spray.
After the ordeal, the girl pressed charges against the police department. The surveillance camera had caught all that had happened and would provide the key evidence needed to support her claim in court.
The YouTube video also goes back and replays key points, using graphics to pinpoint, that prove the girl’s innocence. She clearly had placed a ten dollar bill in the $10 slot. She clearly stated his correct change. The manager pointedly checked the register and confirmed that there had been no twenty dollar bill in the register.
This evidence proving the girl’s innocence and the officer’s mistake would not have been possible had the surveillance camera not been available. It is for security reasons that surveillance cameras are used, and they can help solve cases and prove to be an excellent source of hard evidence.
The video begins by showing the girl working. The officer then pulls up and pays for his order. She then gives him his change. After a time, the officer comes inside demanding he was short changed. His argument was that he had paid twenty dollars and had only received change for a ten. The girl explains she was only handed a ten and says exactly what the change was. The manager, determined to end the argument, double checks the register. There are no twenties inside. The officer, enraged, comes to the girl and threatens her with the mace spray and with arrest. She refuses saying she does not have the money, so the officer maces her and drags her out to his car. Unfortunately, she had to be taken to the hospital because of the effects of the spray.
After the ordeal, the girl pressed charges against the police department. The surveillance camera had caught all that had happened and would provide the key evidence needed to support her claim in court.
The YouTube video also goes back and replays key points, using graphics to pinpoint, that prove the girl’s innocence. She clearly had placed a ten dollar bill in the $10 slot. She clearly stated his correct change. The manager pointedly checked the register and confirmed that there had been no twenty dollar bill in the register.
This evidence proving the girl’s innocence and the officer’s mistake would not have been possible had the surveillance camera not been available. It is for security reasons that surveillance cameras are used, and they can help solve cases and prove to be an excellent source of hard evidence.
Factual Argument?
The topic “hurricanes are increasing in number and ferocity” may be worth arguing to a college audience. Hard evidence that may support, or in some cases disprove, can be obtained. This will make a good factual argument provided proper documented evidence is used.
Arguing that many people die annually because of cancer would not make a good argument. The argument would rely on statistics and probability. It is also very biased. Argument to counter the statement would have little hard evidence. Arguments supporting and not supporting the argument may not be hard evidence alone.
Saying fewer people would die of heart disease each year if more of them paid attention to their diets is hard to argue and inappropriate. The argument is not taking into account the genetics and other outstanding factors that may lead to heart disease other than diet.
Japan might have come to terms more readily in 1945 if the Allies hadn’t demanded unconditional surrender is not a good one to argue. It cannot be proved with evidence that this statement is true. It is more of an opinion than fact.
The topic “boys would do better in school if there were more men teaching in elementary and secondary classrooms” is not worth arguing to a college audience. There would be no evidence to support it other than statistics and, possibly, surveys. Without hard evidence, the argument comes across as an opinion or hypothesis rather than actual fact.
The ever-increasing number of minorities in higher education is evidence that racial problems have just about ended in the United States is also not appropriate for argument. “Racial problems” is a term loosely used in this argument. There are many definitions that are not being taken into account. Also, what constitutes the “end” of the racial problems? Many things are left unexplained.
The topic “there aren’t enough high-paying jobs for college graduates these days” is also inappropriate for argument. It is biased in opinion and will have little evidence to support it.
Hydrogen may never be a viable alternative to fossil fuels because it takes too much energy to change hydrogen into a useable form may be a good topic for argument. Hard evidence is available on the subject which will make this argument factual and unbaised.
Only one of the first forty-three presidents of the United States was a Catholic is also a good argument to present. Evidence taken from historical findings can make this a factual argument that is unbiased.
Political activists have grossly exaggerated the effects of the USA Patriot Act on free expression would not be a good argument. There will be little hard evidence to make this a factual argument.
Arguing that many people die annually because of cancer would not make a good argument. The argument would rely on statistics and probability. It is also very biased. Argument to counter the statement would have little hard evidence. Arguments supporting and not supporting the argument may not be hard evidence alone.
Saying fewer people would die of heart disease each year if more of them paid attention to their diets is hard to argue and inappropriate. The argument is not taking into account the genetics and other outstanding factors that may lead to heart disease other than diet.
Japan might have come to terms more readily in 1945 if the Allies hadn’t demanded unconditional surrender is not a good one to argue. It cannot be proved with evidence that this statement is true. It is more of an opinion than fact.
The topic “boys would do better in school if there were more men teaching in elementary and secondary classrooms” is not worth arguing to a college audience. There would be no evidence to support it other than statistics and, possibly, surveys. Without hard evidence, the argument comes across as an opinion or hypothesis rather than actual fact.
The ever-increasing number of minorities in higher education is evidence that racial problems have just about ended in the United States is also not appropriate for argument. “Racial problems” is a term loosely used in this argument. There are many definitions that are not being taken into account. Also, what constitutes the “end” of the racial problems? Many things are left unexplained.
The topic “there aren’t enough high-paying jobs for college graduates these days” is also inappropriate for argument. It is biased in opinion and will have little evidence to support it.
Hydrogen may never be a viable alternative to fossil fuels because it takes too much energy to change hydrogen into a useable form may be a good topic for argument. Hard evidence is available on the subject which will make this argument factual and unbaised.
Only one of the first forty-three presidents of the United States was a Catholic is also a good argument to present. Evidence taken from historical findings can make this a factual argument that is unbiased.
Political activists have grossly exaggerated the effects of the USA Patriot Act on free expression would not be a good argument. There will be little hard evidence to make this a factual argument.
Sunday, September 30, 2007
Emo Think: Just as Annoying
Emo think. Before I touch on Emo think, I want to clarify what Emo is exactly. Emo is a style somewhere between punk and scene. It is actually described as punk music on estrogen. It revolves around music and emotion basically. The term “emo” is actually derived from the word “emotional.” It’s not hard to see why.
Most people stereotyped as emo tend to wear their heart on their sleeves. A saying such as “would someone please slit my wrists to end my bleeding life” would be commonplace and, unfortunately, stereotypical of an emo. The worst part of this stereotyping is the constant jibes emos receive. They are made fun of for constantly complaining about life to anyone who would listen.
Therefore, in order to be grouped into “emo think,” one must match all the requirements. The style of emo: that is, in between punk and scene; the music of emo: a style characterized by an emotive style focusing on the hardships and mistakes of life; and the emo personality: the typical wearing the heart on the sleeve, even when it’s annoying.
Most people stereotyped as emo tend to wear their heart on their sleeves. A saying such as “would someone please slit my wrists to end my bleeding life” would be commonplace and, unfortunately, stereotypical of an emo. The worst part of this stereotyping is the constant jibes emos receive. They are made fun of for constantly complaining about life to anyone who would listen.
Therefore, in order to be grouped into “emo think,” one must match all the requirements. The style of emo: that is, in between punk and scene; the music of emo: a style characterized by an emotive style focusing on the hardships and mistakes of life; and the emo personality: the typical wearing the heart on the sleeve, even when it’s annoying.
Definitions, but Why?
Serious literature, hate crime, royal family, journalists, big businesses, religion, free speech, state, marriage: all terms for which each individual may have a different definition. To briefly discuss each, I will begin by saying exactly how I would define them. I would take my personal time to look up each term in the dictionary. From there, I would also search them in encyclopedias and find articles about them. All together, I would derive from my information my own individual definition.
Serious literature is a literature I consider to be a challenge to read. I believe a crime is a hate crime provided it was meant to harm a person or group of people either directly or indirectly. A royal family to me would mean one of high public standing and lots of money. A common millionaire may claim that title according to my definition. A journalist is any who may observe a situation and write about it as a profession. I believe a big business to be one of high standing and many stock holders. Religion is a set doctrine of any faith that may be followed. Free speech would include anything that may be assured through our First Amendment rights provided it meets the requirements of the amendment. A state, in America, is one that is governed by the American government and is considered American “property.” Marriage, I believe, is the contract between two people to share their lives together legally and lovingly (we hope!).
Serious literature is a literature I consider to be a challenge to read. I believe a crime is a hate crime provided it was meant to harm a person or group of people either directly or indirectly. A royal family to me would mean one of high public standing and lots of money. A common millionaire may claim that title according to my definition. A journalist is any who may observe a situation and write about it as a profession. I believe a big business to be one of high standing and many stock holders. Religion is a set doctrine of any faith that may be followed. Free speech would include anything that may be assured through our First Amendment rights provided it meets the requirements of the amendment. A state, in America, is one that is governed by the American government and is considered American “property.” Marriage, I believe, is the contract between two people to share their lives together legally and lovingly (we hope!).
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Bring Them Home
Before this class, I was 100% totally against the Iraqi Conflict. My thoughts were as follows:
It is not a war. It was never declared a war. The only reason Bush says it’s a war is to get the American people revved up and gun-ho. Saying it is a war implies it is our American duty to defend our country. It is not our country we are defending. We are not fighting for the American people. We are fighting a civil war dealing with the Iraqis. We are fighting for them. Our freedom was never threatened. The Al Qaeda had something against our government because of the business mistakes of American politicians so they attacked America’s top political bases. It was an attack on our government. To be more exact, it was a direct threat to certain government officials.
I had this opinion because, rather than get caught up in the patriotism of war, I looked at the facts. What was being said did not add up to reality. Some people can be so blind to the truth.
The milblogs have only strengthened my belief that the troops should not be in Iraq. None of those men want to be there. None of them really like what they have to do. None of them know why they’re still there. They want to come home. I want them to come home. I have read their blogs about the horrors they’ve gone through. I’ve read about their hardships. They don’t know what to do anymore. That is not the way it should be. Bring them home.
It is not a war. It was never declared a war. The only reason Bush says it’s a war is to get the American people revved up and gun-ho. Saying it is a war implies it is our American duty to defend our country. It is not our country we are defending. We are not fighting for the American people. We are fighting a civil war dealing with the Iraqis. We are fighting for them. Our freedom was never threatened. The Al Qaeda had something against our government because of the business mistakes of American politicians so they attacked America’s top political bases. It was an attack on our government. To be more exact, it was a direct threat to certain government officials.
I had this opinion because, rather than get caught up in the patriotism of war, I looked at the facts. What was being said did not add up to reality. Some people can be so blind to the truth.
The milblogs have only strengthened my belief that the troops should not be in Iraq. None of those men want to be there. None of them really like what they have to do. None of them know why they’re still there. They want to come home. I want them to come home. I have read their blogs about the horrors they’ve gone through. I’ve read about their hardships. They don’t know what to do anymore. That is not the way it should be. Bring them home.
Thursday, September 20, 2007
Britney Spears: A Mother's Worst Nightmare?
The argument in Nisey Williams’ “Why I Hate Britney” essay is one that is very ad homonym. She is constantly attacking Britney Spears on a personal level. I’d like to say she has a lot of evidence to support such fervent opposition to the famous pop star; however, even Nisey admits there is “no documented evidence” (Williams). This puts the credulity of her facts in question. Much of her support comes from personal opinion and what is considered to be fashion trends. There is no set evidence to support her claims.
Her style of writing gets the reader involved. Much of what she says challenges the reader to think as she sees things. She asks rhetorical questions such as “How much worse will these statistics be by the time my daughter reaches the age of fifteen?” It leaves the reader rather concerned, and leaves the reader more open to taking Williams’ words more seriously. Although she states in earnest that she blames Britney for her fear of motherhood, Nisey Williams then strays from the original thought to go to pop culture as a whole. To me, this is a switch of focus in the main point; however, the purpose of her essay is well met. She wanted to get across why she is concerned about motherhood and succeeded in doing so.
For these reasons I have stated, I give Nisey Williams’ essay a B+ grade of 88.9%.
Her style of writing gets the reader involved. Much of what she says challenges the reader to think as she sees things. She asks rhetorical questions such as “How much worse will these statistics be by the time my daughter reaches the age of fifteen?” It leaves the reader rather concerned, and leaves the reader more open to taking Williams’ words more seriously. Although she states in earnest that she blames Britney for her fear of motherhood, Nisey Williams then strays from the original thought to go to pop culture as a whole. To me, this is a switch of focus in the main point; however, the purpose of her essay is well met. She wanted to get across why she is concerned about motherhood and succeeded in doing so.
For these reasons I have stated, I give Nisey Williams’ essay a B+ grade of 88.9%.
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
Arts of a Different Nature
In evaluating a musical I’d have to use many different criteria of evaluation. First I would consider what it is exactly that makes a musical interesting? Is it the music? Is it the dialogue perhaps? If I’m going to use dialogue I must consider a multitude of things. Are there witty lines? Is it well rehearsed? Is it comprehensible? Then further on I would take into consideration the music; that which makes a musical exactly that: a musical. Are the tunes catchy? Are they emotional maybe? Are the lines audible and pronunciated? This relies heavily on the actors. Are the actors able to act out their parts convincingly? Do they know their lines? Is their character fully developed? All these and more I must take into account.
Some things, however, are out of the actor’s control. When I say this, I mean to refer to scenery and props. Are the scene changes quick and smooth? Is the scenery lifelike or is it completely fake and unconvincing? Are the props where they’re supposed to be when they’re supposed to be there? Are there any props at all? Do they serve the purpose they were intended? Of course, all these criteria can be evaluated simply by watching a musical.
When it comes to something such as fashion designers I wouldn’t know where to start. I’d have to do research first before I could even dream of what criteria to evaluate. I would most likely look up fashion designers online. From there, I may go to fashion magazines and articles especially devoted to the fashion world. If all goes well, I will be able to derive from the information I find several areas of criteria to evaluate.
Some things, however, are out of the actor’s control. When I say this, I mean to refer to scenery and props. Are the scene changes quick and smooth? Is the scenery lifelike or is it completely fake and unconvincing? Are the props where they’re supposed to be when they’re supposed to be there? Are there any props at all? Do they serve the purpose they were intended? Of course, all these criteria can be evaluated simply by watching a musical.
When it comes to something such as fashion designers I wouldn’t know where to start. I’d have to do research first before I could even dream of what criteria to evaluate. I would most likely look up fashion designers online. From there, I may go to fashion magazines and articles especially devoted to the fashion world. If all goes well, I will be able to derive from the information I find several areas of criteria to evaluate.
Thursday, September 13, 2007
Out of This World
The main graphics of the site http://www.circlemakers.org/ take up the whole screen except in the fact that it is aligned to the left of the page. The text is always shown in a little box of its own, separate from the rest of the graphics. The larger the text, the bigger and more center the box containing that text shall be. The background for the site is dark (black) which sets up the zodiac star constellation graphics. This gives the reader an alienated feeling, one associated with awe and wonder. This dark background, light text is constant throughout the whole site. The texts on every other page also are in its own box.
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
Pain and Suffering
In this image, a woman, battered and troubled, waits for her future. She has lost everything: her house, clothes, food. Why did this happen? According to the source of the photo, her house had been burned by refugees. Of course, anyone who saw the picture without the text wouldn’t know that. From the photograph, however, the reader still feels empathy towards the woman, and that is the main argument for this picture. Feel for this woman for she has a horribly difficult life. That is what I gain just from the photo itself.
Remember
One of the most touching milblog entries I have read up to date is one of remembrance. I think it is important to remember something like the 9/11 attack, but I do not believe we should dwell on it. One soldier expresses that remembering the 9/11 attack is what fuels him to continue fighting. Is this really a good thing? I’m not so sure it is. I personally think we should be out of Iraq. To hear how a soldier wants to go back and fight is mind boggling. Maybe there is something more that I haven’t thought. It’s hard to get into the skin of a soldier, but these milblogs have helped me get a glimpse of their perspective. In time, I will understand more why exactly the soldiers want to fight.
Sullivan and Iraq
Andrew Sullivan’s web page http://andrewsullivan.com/ is a political blog that typically provides quick responses to daily events and detailed critiques of material in other media. Media may include other media sites and even national newspapers. Sullivan makes certain to insert links in many of his blog posts. Unfortunately for the reader, Sullivan doesn’t explain the link or where it really leads to. It is up to the reader to figure that out. He does, however, critique the government of America and how it is being run in terms of the Iraqi conflict. He points out right away the disputes and hardship that the Iraqis are facing.
He provides certain quotes and graphics. He explains them very well. He, at one point or another used an Ad Homonym to attack Petraeus and the situation in Iraq by making Petraeus look like a fool. He reveals the fallacy that Petraeus is for this war but hasn’t really thought about it. Much of what Sullivan says is directly related to what government officials are doing in order to help (or hinder) the progress of America.
His work is fairly unbiased but tends to lean towards the democratic side. It is quite obvious his dislike in how things are being run by the Republican President and officials. On more than one occasion he uses rhetorical questioning to gain the reader’s interaction and make the reader truly think about what Sullivan is trying to say.
One major thing that caught my attention was his “no democracy = no Iraq” entry. He clearly believes that, unless all the tribes (Shiite and Sunni), there will never be the unity needed for a democracy or a full functioning country. There are also times where Sullivan, rather than explain things or comments on things, will post a video or link to a news website so the reader may get the information firsthand without having to get it with that biased edge.
Sullivan is also very descriptive. This helps the reader in figuring out what exactly Sullivan is trying to portray. From its presentation, it is as if Sullivan wants us to take in his thoughts in their entirety. The subject of the Iraqi conflict is discussed in multiple posts. In fact, it really all Sullivan is focusing on. He describes what is going on in the Iraqi conflict in a more empathetic nature. This is done by showing just how hurt and dysfunctional Iraq and its people really are.
Last major discussion topic Sullivan loves to hit on: government officials. Sullivan is constantly using the Ad Homonym approach when talking about officials. He makes it seem like they are not very intelligent sometimes; and, at best, he presents them as ignorant. Sullivan is obviously getting down and dirty with the government, the officials representing the American people, and the Iraqi conflict itself.
He provides certain quotes and graphics. He explains them very well. He, at one point or another used an Ad Homonym to attack Petraeus and the situation in Iraq by making Petraeus look like a fool. He reveals the fallacy that Petraeus is for this war but hasn’t really thought about it. Much of what Sullivan says is directly related to what government officials are doing in order to help (or hinder) the progress of America.
His work is fairly unbiased but tends to lean towards the democratic side. It is quite obvious his dislike in how things are being run by the Republican President and officials. On more than one occasion he uses rhetorical questioning to gain the reader’s interaction and make the reader truly think about what Sullivan is trying to say.
One major thing that caught my attention was his “no democracy = no Iraq” entry. He clearly believes that, unless all the tribes (Shiite and Sunni), there will never be the unity needed for a democracy or a full functioning country. There are also times where Sullivan, rather than explain things or comments on things, will post a video or link to a news website so the reader may get the information firsthand without having to get it with that biased edge.
Sullivan is also very descriptive. This helps the reader in figuring out what exactly Sullivan is trying to portray. From its presentation, it is as if Sullivan wants us to take in his thoughts in their entirety. The subject of the Iraqi conflict is discussed in multiple posts. In fact, it really all Sullivan is focusing on. He describes what is going on in the Iraqi conflict in a more empathetic nature. This is done by showing just how hurt and dysfunctional Iraq and its people really are.
Last major discussion topic Sullivan loves to hit on: government officials. Sullivan is constantly using the Ad Homonym approach when talking about officials. He makes it seem like they are not very intelligent sometimes; and, at best, he presents them as ignorant. Sullivan is obviously getting down and dirty with the government, the officials representing the American people, and the Iraqi conflict itself.
Sunday, September 9, 2007
Wiki
http://transcendlife.pbwiki.com/
This is the working URL for my Wiki. It's not even near being personalized due to the fact that I've been hospitalized this past week. Hopefully, I'll have things down by Monday or Tuesday this week. I notice already that I will have fun with this wiki. It's a great way to get to know other people in my class. This is important because we never really see eachother as a class because it's an online course, so this makes things more personal. I think that is important in the learning process: to know the people sharing the class and having at least some kind of connection with them.
This is the working URL for my Wiki. It's not even near being personalized due to the fact that I've been hospitalized this past week. Hopefully, I'll have things down by Monday or Tuesday this week. I notice already that I will have fun with this wiki. It's a great way to get to know other people in my class. This is important because we never really see eachother as a class because it's an online course, so this makes things more personal. I think that is important in the learning process: to know the people sharing the class and having at least some kind of connection with them.
Saturday, September 8, 2007
That Unseen Bond
The milblogs always offer a look into the soldier’s side of things that I’ve never been able to see. This week, reading the new milblogs, I realized a lot happens in the “in-betweens” of things not just at home or on the field. Once again I find myself feeling a connection to soldiers as human beings rather than tough, heartless people sent overseas to kill. They, however, reveal in their milblogs this untold and unspoken connection amongst each other that only they as soldiers can understand. A glimpse into this connection made me feel more involved in what these soldiers go through. I have greater understanding of what they feel when they’re in the situations they’re put in. I feel a little bit of that connection only because these milblogs have revealed it to me.
Saturday, September 1, 2007
Women in Advertising
The part in the beginning of the presentation concerning women in advertising that really caught my attention was the presenter demanding of us to take advertising seriously. It was a call to attention! It immediately got me to pay attention and to take in every word like it was the most important thing at the time. Not only did she say this, she brought the attention to how important advertisement has become with a comparison of graphs in the expenses used for advertisement. She finished off her introduction by stating advertisements is everywhere!
She sets out her verbal presentation in a manner that is easily followed by using words such as “first” and “next” one step at a time. She also uses rhetorical questions to keep the listener involved and ever thinking about the context of her argument. The truth behind the advertisement is revealed; vital information. She directs the attention to what is really being said by revealing the horrors of the advertisement concerning women.
There are constantly graphics being showed that tied into what the speaker is saying. She directs the attention to many of them, explaining what’s going on and what they mean. This helps the listener to stay on track and stay interested. She uses a graph in the beginning to show facts. She uses pictures of all the different types of advertisement available to show just how vast a variety there is and how it truly is everywhere. When speaking of eating disorders, pictures of extremely skinny women are shown to emphasize what she is saying.
The speaker is dressed in a plain colored shirt. This does not distract the listener from what she is saying, which is important to the presentation of the speaker’s argument. She wants the audience to pay attention to what she is saying, not what she is wearing. Her tone is serious and impressive. You can’t help but sit there and know that what she is saying is important by how she is saying it. She sends an emotional appeal across to the audience through her tone at times also. This leads the audience to feel empathy with the speaker, which is also a vital characteristic in her argument. She is constantly keeping the audience involved by the excellent use of her eye contact. She is constantly bringing in the audience with her eyes.
The most memorable part of the presentation was one involving a graphic. A girl was sitting and the headline was “The more you subtract, the more you add.” This was especially memorable, not because it was a graphic, but because she presented it in a certain way. She gave special care to the headline. She stated it “The more you subtract, the more you add. What a horrible message. The more you subtract, the more you add.” Presenting the saying first, then stating how it was a horrible message, and furthermore stating the headline again to further imprint it in our minds was an excellent way to make sure it was not to be forgotten.
The presentation was, in essence, very effective. Her constant eye contact and graphics made the audience constantly at attention. Her tone brought the feeling of importance in her words. Even the jokes she made had relevance and were fun to listen to! There was no straying; this woman had every element necessary to keep the attention and respect of the audience. The overall presentation of the argument was extremely effective in that it would not be easy to forget the whole itself.
She sets out her verbal presentation in a manner that is easily followed by using words such as “first” and “next” one step at a time. She also uses rhetorical questions to keep the listener involved and ever thinking about the context of her argument. The truth behind the advertisement is revealed; vital information. She directs the attention to what is really being said by revealing the horrors of the advertisement concerning women.
There are constantly graphics being showed that tied into what the speaker is saying. She directs the attention to many of them, explaining what’s going on and what they mean. This helps the listener to stay on track and stay interested. She uses a graph in the beginning to show facts. She uses pictures of all the different types of advertisement available to show just how vast a variety there is and how it truly is everywhere. When speaking of eating disorders, pictures of extremely skinny women are shown to emphasize what she is saying.
The speaker is dressed in a plain colored shirt. This does not distract the listener from what she is saying, which is important to the presentation of the speaker’s argument. She wants the audience to pay attention to what she is saying, not what she is wearing. Her tone is serious and impressive. You can’t help but sit there and know that what she is saying is important by how she is saying it. She sends an emotional appeal across to the audience through her tone at times also. This leads the audience to feel empathy with the speaker, which is also a vital characteristic in her argument. She is constantly keeping the audience involved by the excellent use of her eye contact. She is constantly bringing in the audience with her eyes.
The most memorable part of the presentation was one involving a graphic. A girl was sitting and the headline was “The more you subtract, the more you add.” This was especially memorable, not because it was a graphic, but because she presented it in a certain way. She gave special care to the headline. She stated it “The more you subtract, the more you add. What a horrible message. The more you subtract, the more you add.” Presenting the saying first, then stating how it was a horrible message, and furthermore stating the headline again to further imprint it in our minds was an excellent way to make sure it was not to be forgotten.
The presentation was, in essence, very effective. Her constant eye contact and graphics made the audience constantly at attention. Her tone brought the feeling of importance in her words. Even the jokes she made had relevance and were fun to listen to! There was no straying; this woman had every element necessary to keep the attention and respect of the audience. The overall presentation of the argument was extremely effective in that it would not be easy to forget the whole itself.
Online Safe Wonders
One Web site I admire greatly is the Break the Cycle Web site: http://www.breakthecycle.org/ . This site is dedicated to helping youth end domestic violence. This digital presentation of the site and information is definitely the best way to get things done. It is readily available to anyone interested. One merely needs to visit the site at any time and they will get whatever information they need. Not just is it readily available, but it is very helpful to a person in need. It lists a number of hotlines for certain places or for emergencies. It even has a “sister site” called The Safe Space. You can easily reach this site through Break the Cycle.org by a mere click of a button.
This Safe Space is accessible from Break the Cycle.org. It is a place for someone currently facing domestic violence. The glory of it is simply this: should an aggressor walk in while one is visiting the site there is a button you press which automatically takes you to a random site and makes the Safe Space untraceable. The aggressor would have no way of knowing that the victim was seeking help! It is amazing, and no other form other than this digital presentation via Web site could accomplish this.
Many of that, which is on the site, in order to put it in print text, would have to be changed. No longer could you “click on links” to get to another Web site. One would merely have to list the links, what they do, and where they take you. Also, Break the Cycle and The Safe Space could not share the same printed text. Each would have their own. It would not be possible to easily access one from the other. Much information that is set in stone, were it to be given through speech, may accidentally be forgotten, and also, the information would not be readily available for those who seek it.
The lack of information in text is my main concern. It would be impossible to “ask the experts” on a piece of paper. On the site, one merely needs to click on the link, send in the question, and one would receive an answer within 24 hours. However, was it given through text rather than Web site, who knows how long one would have to wait to receive a response? The safety and privacy would be lost forever in any other form. The Safe Space feature of being untraceable would be lost forever. It is essential they make it safe to visit regardless of any situation a person may be in! Imagine, a girl in an abusive relationship, has a pamphlet about ending domestic violence. The guy sees it; she gets beat up or even killed. With the Safe Space feature, this risk is greatly reduced if not eliminated. How wonderful that such help is there for anyone who needs it.
This Safe Space is accessible from Break the Cycle.org. It is a place for someone currently facing domestic violence. The glory of it is simply this: should an aggressor walk in while one is visiting the site there is a button you press which automatically takes you to a random site and makes the Safe Space untraceable. The aggressor would have no way of knowing that the victim was seeking help! It is amazing, and no other form other than this digital presentation via Web site could accomplish this.
Many of that, which is on the site, in order to put it in print text, would have to be changed. No longer could you “click on links” to get to another Web site. One would merely have to list the links, what they do, and where they take you. Also, Break the Cycle and The Safe Space could not share the same printed text. Each would have their own. It would not be possible to easily access one from the other. Much information that is set in stone, were it to be given through speech, may accidentally be forgotten, and also, the information would not be readily available for those who seek it.
The lack of information in text is my main concern. It would be impossible to “ask the experts” on a piece of paper. On the site, one merely needs to click on the link, send in the question, and one would receive an answer within 24 hours. However, was it given through text rather than Web site, who knows how long one would have to wait to receive a response? The safety and privacy would be lost forever in any other form. The Safe Space feature of being untraceable would be lost forever. It is essential they make it safe to visit regardless of any situation a person may be in! Imagine, a girl in an abusive relationship, has a pamphlet about ending domestic violence. The guy sees it; she gets beat up or even killed. With the Safe Space feature, this risk is greatly reduced if not eliminated. How wonderful that such help is there for anyone who needs it.
Camaraderie at Its Best
Once again I found myself looking at the words of a soldier who would rather be home. Most of the stories were similar in content. They had things dealing with orders, death, daily grievances, or reinstallation into society. There was one blog entry that made me smile. It was about a “Great Wall” that a Romanian trooper created. It was made in honor of the Romanian and American troops that worked together and all the soldiers on duty. The patches of the soldiers, name and place of origin, were put up on the wall. This was such a great show of camaraderie! The bond amongst the soldiers is very evident in this story. It made me smile.
Saturday, August 25, 2007
Sad Story...
When I read the milblog posts, I wasn’t so sure what to think. I honestly don’t think our guys should be over there fighting as it were, and from the sounds of it, they don’t exactly like it there either. The hardest thing for me to read was the nightmares. Many of the posts were about nightmares they have. One man outright stated he and many others suffer from PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) and they aren’t getting any help! The U.S. government promised that they would have programs for them to help them with that, but it isn’t happening.
The nightmares and PTSD hit me on a personal level only because I have the same problem. It’s just caused by something else. In that sense I can really relate to what our guys are dealing with, and the fact that they don’t even have help available to them for it is horrifying. They need that counseling, and some even need medication. It’s sad to hear their stories about friends who have been killed and how they have nightmares about it.
It’s also sad in the fact that they can’t live like they used to before the conflict. Many have had relationships go bad because they were gone. They have different personalities and how they live is different than before. The change from soldier to civilian is hard for many of them. Unfortunately, there’s no plan to help them get re-integrated into the civilian lifestyle. They have to do it themselves. I think it’s wrong to send them somewhere, make them hard killers who are put at such stressful levels some kind of damage is always done, and then ship them back to the U.S. and expect them to make friendly again all by themselves.
The whole thing is just wrong.
The nightmares and PTSD hit me on a personal level only because I have the same problem. It’s just caused by something else. In that sense I can really relate to what our guys are dealing with, and the fact that they don’t even have help available to them for it is horrifying. They need that counseling, and some even need medication. It’s sad to hear their stories about friends who have been killed and how they have nightmares about it.
It’s also sad in the fact that they can’t live like they used to before the conflict. Many have had relationships go bad because they were gone. They have different personalities and how they live is different than before. The change from soldier to civilian is hard for many of them. Unfortunately, there’s no plan to help them get re-integrated into the civilian lifestyle. They have to do it themselves. I think it’s wrong to send them somewhere, make them hard killers who are put at such stressful levels some kind of damage is always done, and then ship them back to the U.S. and expect them to make friendly again all by themselves.
The whole thing is just wrong.
Friday, August 24, 2007
Blogging is just as Dangerous as Bloggers are Dumb
Those so called “dangers” of blogging online really don’t freak me out. I understand that yes, there are crazy people out there who like to stalk others or want to hurt them. If you set your privacy settings correctly, then you have nothing to fear from unknown scary people. I think the only reason having a blog, posting things, and letting others read or view them is anywhere near dangerous is because too many of the blog users don’t understand how to set privacy and account settings.
When I read that people could use a search engine to find your site or use your site to look up your own personal information, I did get concerned. However, I don’t have anything bad on my sites. Too many times it was stated that possible candidates for job positions weren’t hired because of blog content. This does not concern me and I honestly think those people were idiots to put that stuff up on the web anyway. Of course anyone can view it! I don’t have bad stuff on my site; and, after reading this, I actually went on my web log sites to check on my account and privacy settings.
My first stop was Xanga. I hardly use it anymore, but it was definitely worth checking on. I noticed in privacy settings they actually ask if it is ok that your site be found through search engines and I quickly changed it to “no!” It was also possible for anyone who knew my name, my username, or even my email to find my site. It was completely unprotected! I was amazed at how much was available to other people so they could search and view my site. I immediately went to my other sites and fixed them up too. Now, I definitely don’t have to worry about any unwanted visitors to my sites. Only my friends or people I allow could ever see them. I would never have thought about it if I hadn’t read that it was so easy for an individual to find your site.
Honestly, I think this isn’t a huge issue unless you’re dumb enough to put stupid, illegal, or porn-like stuff on your site. If you don’t have your privacy settings strict, but you don’t have stuff that like on your site then you don’t have as much to worry about. However, if you’re like me and actually checked out what all was available in the privacy settings and fixed them for limited viewing, then you’re worry-free pretty much. It’s only a big deal if you make it that way and leave yourself vulnerable. Huzzah for online safety smarts!
When I read that people could use a search engine to find your site or use your site to look up your own personal information, I did get concerned. However, I don’t have anything bad on my sites. Too many times it was stated that possible candidates for job positions weren’t hired because of blog content. This does not concern me and I honestly think those people were idiots to put that stuff up on the web anyway. Of course anyone can view it! I don’t have bad stuff on my site; and, after reading this, I actually went on my web log sites to check on my account and privacy settings.
My first stop was Xanga. I hardly use it anymore, but it was definitely worth checking on. I noticed in privacy settings they actually ask if it is ok that your site be found through search engines and I quickly changed it to “no!” It was also possible for anyone who knew my name, my username, or even my email to find my site. It was completely unprotected! I was amazed at how much was available to other people so they could search and view my site. I immediately went to my other sites and fixed them up too. Now, I definitely don’t have to worry about any unwanted visitors to my sites. Only my friends or people I allow could ever see them. I would never have thought about it if I hadn’t read that it was so easy for an individual to find your site.
Honestly, I think this isn’t a huge issue unless you’re dumb enough to put stupid, illegal, or porn-like stuff on your site. If you don’t have your privacy settings strict, but you don’t have stuff that like on your site then you don’t have as much to worry about. However, if you’re like me and actually checked out what all was available in the privacy settings and fixed them for limited viewing, then you’re worry-free pretty much. It’s only a big deal if you make it that way and leave yourself vulnerable. Huzzah for online safety smarts!
Sosnoski Sounds Like a Sneeze to Me
I’m not going to go on like I understood everything in the Sosnoski article, because I didn’t. However, there were plenty of things I did get out of it. Sosnoski is convinced that reading things electronically will be the predominant form of reading in the future. I disagree, but that is not the point. Much of what he stated in the early part of the reading was a simple use of today’s technology and how it will eventually affect the future’s reading. Sosnoski explain that anything coming across the screen is neutralized into electronic information. This is something I find to be true.
As this electronic information became readily available to us, we more or less concentrated on how easy and fast we could get the information rather than the importance, relevance, or depth of the information. Sosnoski states this as “space portioning out time.” The dangers of this are all too obvious, unfortunately. Because the information is so readily available, and seemingly for free, it is easy for loss of authorship, coherence, meaning, as well as depth and context to occur. It’s sad because, as I read, I reflected on all the times I have looked up information on the web and realized that I had not paid attention to the author, nor cared what it meant to copy and past certain parts or link it to someone else. It is a serious loss of privacy and ownership in that sense. I am guilty of this charge in that I have taken for granted the information available to me and those who provided it. It is sad indeed! One of my favorite quotes Sosnoski used, by Baudrillard, was “We live in a world where there is more and more information, and less and less meaning.”
One cool thing about reading, so says Sosnoski, is that it is a process of selection. I think there’s truth to it. As he put how much of what we retain is what we mainly choose to retain as importance. Generally, what we remember from any reading is plot summaries, characters, important scenes and themes. It was interesting to read Sosnoski explain how his friend had merely skimmed a book that he (Sosnoski) had taken the time to read and they both ended up remembering much of the same things.
Sosnoski talks about search engines and how a search engine is much like and indexing program a human could do; only it does it faster, more thoroughly, and more systematically. Talk about debasing the humans! It was stated like we were incompetent at indexing things. Of course, I’m sure this article wasn’t even trying to insult anyone. Along with search engines, the fact that we read less of the actual text was discussed. Yes, many people skim or peck at things and only pick up some of the things they believe is important; but, I do not agree with Sosnoski in that the information brought up by a search engine is completely inadequate in comparison to the actual text (then again, I wasn’t sure if I was really getting what he was trying to say). So, I won’t venture into that. Better to be thought stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt, right?
The more hilarious, yet pitiful part of these hypertext readers is that graphics do play what would be considered a more meaningful role than the words. Sad people that we are, much of the information we come to comprehend is more or less shown with graphics along with words. Also, teachers don’t appreciate how much of their students us the web to gain information. So many resources are incorrect and many more may even be misinterpreted or misunderstood. That is another thing I thought was really cool about this article. The fact that how the reader approaches a text is more important than the text content in how the information is received really blows my mind! I never think of these things, and it’s so true! I’m actually glad I read this, even though it was definitely a tough read. It challenged me to think and that’s all I really care about, ha-ha.
As this electronic information became readily available to us, we more or less concentrated on how easy and fast we could get the information rather than the importance, relevance, or depth of the information. Sosnoski states this as “space portioning out time.” The dangers of this are all too obvious, unfortunately. Because the information is so readily available, and seemingly for free, it is easy for loss of authorship, coherence, meaning, as well as depth and context to occur. It’s sad because, as I read, I reflected on all the times I have looked up information on the web and realized that I had not paid attention to the author, nor cared what it meant to copy and past certain parts or link it to someone else. It is a serious loss of privacy and ownership in that sense. I am guilty of this charge in that I have taken for granted the information available to me and those who provided it. It is sad indeed! One of my favorite quotes Sosnoski used, by Baudrillard, was “We live in a world where there is more and more information, and less and less meaning.”
One cool thing about reading, so says Sosnoski, is that it is a process of selection. I think there’s truth to it. As he put how much of what we retain is what we mainly choose to retain as importance. Generally, what we remember from any reading is plot summaries, characters, important scenes and themes. It was interesting to read Sosnoski explain how his friend had merely skimmed a book that he (Sosnoski) had taken the time to read and they both ended up remembering much of the same things.
Sosnoski talks about search engines and how a search engine is much like and indexing program a human could do; only it does it faster, more thoroughly, and more systematically. Talk about debasing the humans! It was stated like we were incompetent at indexing things. Of course, I’m sure this article wasn’t even trying to insult anyone. Along with search engines, the fact that we read less of the actual text was discussed. Yes, many people skim or peck at things and only pick up some of the things they believe is important; but, I do not agree with Sosnoski in that the information brought up by a search engine is completely inadequate in comparison to the actual text (then again, I wasn’t sure if I was really getting what he was trying to say). So, I won’t venture into that. Better to be thought stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt, right?
The more hilarious, yet pitiful part of these hypertext readers is that graphics do play what would be considered a more meaningful role than the words. Sad people that we are, much of the information we come to comprehend is more or less shown with graphics along with words. Also, teachers don’t appreciate how much of their students us the web to gain information. So many resources are incorrect and many more may even be misinterpreted or misunderstood. That is another thing I thought was really cool about this article. The fact that how the reader approaches a text is more important than the text content in how the information is received really blows my mind! I never think of these things, and it’s so true! I’m actually glad I read this, even though it was definitely a tough read. It challenged me to think and that’s all I really care about, ha-ha.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
